Our skies are being sprayed with aluminum and barium - discussion of this is ridiculed by many as the "chemtrail conspiracy theory", yet it is openly discussed in MEDLINE indexed peer reviewed literature: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/evidence-atmospheric-aerosol-spraying, http://www.greenmedinfo.com/keyword/atmospheric-aerosol-spraying
If this seems crazy, note that in 1976, the UN drafted a treaty acknowledging the existence of weather weapons: http://www.scribd.com/doc/3436120/UN-1976-Weather-Weapon-Treaty
Also, Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Advisor to Jimmy Carter, noted in "Between Two Ages" cited relevant literature and acknowledged that "techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm, thereby weakening a nation’s capacity and forcing it to accept the demands of the competitor” (Gordon J. F. MacDonald, “Space,” in Toward the Years 2018, p. 34)." (Between Two Ages : America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (New York : Viking Press, c1970), p. 57 - see more relevant citations here: http://www.earthemperor.com/2008/11/18/between-two-ages-americas-role-in-the-technetronic-era-by-zbigniew-brzezinski/)
Weather modification using aerosol spraying has been going on for an extremely long time - it was even the subject of a 1974 Senate Hearing: http://www.scribd.com/doc/44374249/Weather-Modification-During-Vietnam-War-1974-Senate-Hearing
A plethora of government documentation discusses it: http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=1441 (The SMOKING GUN in all of this is the report 'Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base', excerpts of which are given in the provided link)
Air Force Literature, particularly "Weather As a Force Multiplier", also discusses this: http://tinyurl.com/6yfwlep
Seymour Hersh noted that weather warfare was used in Vietnam: http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20D13FB3F5F117B93C1A9178CD85F468785F9&scp=1&sq=Rainmaking+Is+Used+As+Weapon+by+U.S&st=cse,
http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20A17F83E5814728DDDA00994DD405B848BF1D3&scp=3&sq=Rainmaking+Is+Used+As+Weapon+by+U.S&st=cse
And it has come out that the British Government secretly sprayed pathogens over the British population: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience
Use of aerosol spraying in warfare dates back to the 1940s. As reported in "Deadly Allies : Canada’s Secret War, 1937-1947" by John Bryden (Toronto : McClelland and Stewart, c1989), "Nobel laureate, saver of hundreds of thousands of lives through the discovery of insulin, [Sir Frederick] Banting had written what turns out to be the blueprint for bacteriological warfare research for the next two decades. Even within four years, before the war was over, his ideas for infected bullets and shells, the rearing of disease-carrying insects and the aerial spraying of deadly bacteria became weapons of reality. [...] Even Charles Best, Banting’s co-discoverer of insulin, became an adviser to the Defence Research on biological warfare after the war. [...] [James] Craigie, [Richard] Hare, [Dudley] Irwin, [Colin] Lucas and [Philip] Greey all offered suggestions on how to dry and revive infectious bacteria, and what should serves as a carrier. Sawdust took the lead over powdered carbon, starch or sand, and within the week [Sir Frederick] Banting was back in Ottawa asking for an airplane for an experiment in aerial dispersal. [...] . . . [Sir Frederick] Banting scribbled in his diary about killing “3 or 4 million young huns — without mercy — without feeling” and watching the Germans “wriggle & stew in their own juice — even as they with cruel and evil eye would see us of inferior heritage and stock wriggle.” [...] If retaliation was ordered, explained Dr. [Tom] King, the plan was to infect the peat and then fly the bomber in a series of hops — Vancouver, Hawaii — to Japan. There it would disperse its deadly cargo. Five years after Banting’s original sawdust experiment on Balsam Lake in Ontario’s cottage country, the weapon he had only imagined had become reality.": http://www.earthemperor.com/2008/10/29/deadly-allies-canadas-secret-war-1937-1947-by-john-bryden/
Links to reliable sources on this issue can be found be reading the following: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/aluminum-vapor-release-in-the-upper-atmosphere/,
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/a-pilot-reports-increasing-chemtrail-spraying-over-europe/,
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/an-extensive-list-of-patents/#more-3828,
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/a-recomended-national-program-in-weather-modification-icas-report-10a/
The U.S air force whistleblower Kristen Meghan has recently come out confirming the reality of this program: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC1epPqqziE
Dr. Michel Chossudovsky has noted that the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is an operational weapon of mass destruction with the potential to be used against rogue states, with the power to alter the weather, disrupt regional electrical power systems, and modify the Earth's magnetic field, and negatively affect people's health: http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO409F.html
If this seems crazy, note that in 1996, during a Department of Defense news briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen said that "There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler [sic] has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. OTHERS ARE ENGAGING EVEN IN AN ECO- TYPE OF TERRORISM WHEREBY THEY CAN ALTER THE CLIMATE, SET OFF EARTHQUAKES, VOLCANOES REMOTELY THROUGH THE USE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES." (emphasis added): http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=674
The EU Parliament, in a report on HAARP, noted, “With its far-reaching impact on the environment HAARP is a matter of global concern and we have to ask whether its advantages really outweigh the risks. The environmental impact and the ethical aspect must be closely examined before any further research and testing takes place. HAARP is a project of which the public is almost completely unaware, and this needs to be remedied.”
It furthermore noted the following chilling fact: “From the 1950s the USA conducted explosions of nuclear material in the Van Allen Belt to investigate the effect of the electro-magnetic pulse generated by nuclear weapon explosions at these heights on radio communications and the operation of radar. This created new magnetic radiation belts which covered nearly the whole earth. The electrons travelled along magnetic lines of force and created an artificial Aurora Borealis above the North Pole. These military tests are liable to disrupt the Van Allen belt for a long period. The earth's magnetic field could be disrupted over large areas, which would obstruct radio communications. According to US scientists it could take hundreds of years for the Van Allen belt to return to normal. HAARP could result in changes in weather patterns. It could also influence whole ecosystems, especially in the sensitive Antarctic regions.
Another damaging consequence of HAARP is the occurrence of holes in the ionosphere caused by the powerful radio beams. The ionosphere protects us from incoming cosmic radiation. The hope is that the holes will fill again, but our experience of change in the ozone layer points in the other direction. This means substantial holes in the ionosphere that protects us.”: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FTEXT+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+XML+V0%2F%2FEN
Links to serious information on this subject can be found here: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/want-to-know-about-haarp/
Of interest to what follows is the fact that I uploaded a series of 1985 videos on Radiofrequency Weapons to the internet, mirroring others: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9FC3D8CF17F09C91
Galina Kurdina’s medical records and records from a private investigator establish that she had exposure to nano-materials that interacted with radiofrequency emissions to which she was harmfully exposed: http://www.organizationofmindcontrolvictims.com/proofs/
From the Science and Technology Options Assessment (June 2000), Crowd Control Technologies (An appraisal of technologies for political control), European Parliament, p. 46, we have the following: "The most controversial 'non-lethal' crowd control and anti-materiel technology proposed by the US are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behaviour in a variety of unusual ways. Some microwave systems have been proposed which can raise body temperature to between 105 to 107 degrees F, to provide a disabling effect in a manner based on the microwave cooker principle. However, the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system. There are many reports on so called psychotronic weapons which are beyond the brief of this study but one comment can be made. The research undertaken todate both in the US and in Russia can be divided into two related areas: (i) individual mind control and (ii) crowd control. That the US has undertaken a variety of mind control programmes in the past such as MkULTRA and MkDELTA is a matter of public record and those using electromagnetic radiation such as PANDORA have been the focus of researchers in para-politics for many years. More recently, authors such as Begich and Roderick have alleged significant breakthroughs in the ability of military high frequency electromagnetic technologies to manipulate human behaviour.": http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/stoa/2000/168394/DG-4-STOA_ET(2000)168394_EN(PAR02).pdf
See also the Testimony of GENERAL Robert L. Schweitzer on Radio Frequency Weapons: https://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1997_hr/j970617s.htm
“Today there is a new class of radically new and important radio frequency weapons (RFW) which merits your attention as it emerges. And in this case, the horse is out of the barn. Transfers have occurred and are occurring. Equally true, however, is the fact that there are things that can be done to protect our nation, which is the underlying objective of today’s hearing. Certainly one of these things is to recognize that export control documents, particularly the Militarily Critical Technologies List, needs to be reviewed to determine if radio frequency technologies should be considered in the same careful way we do nuclear technologies. I respectfully suggest that this is the case; stronger controls are needed. One example is Reltron tubes which went to a friendly nation, one who sells products widely–sometimes to nations who do not like us. These tubes, which can be small or large, generate intense radio frequency pulses and can be used as RF weapons.
Before we go further I wish to state clearly for you and for the public record that I do not speak for the Department of Defense, for any military service or any government agency. I come before you only as one who has researched this area for the past year and is writing a White Paper on the subject, one which will be offered to DoD for their use and disposition.
Some of you may know about radio frequency weapons, where they came from, what they can do and what the implications are.
Although there are a number of groups and individuals concerned with this subject, I have found that somewhat paradoxically the word has not really gotten out in Washington itself. Despite the existence of a Presidential commission, an Infrastructure Protection Task Force, a Critical Infrastructure Working Group, an Information Warfare School at the National Defense University, and other working groups, to include divisions on the Joint Staff in the Pentagon, as well as a few very dedicated and brilliant mid-level people in DoD, a general understanding is lacking. This is true not only of RFW, but of their immediate threat to our DoD and national infrastructure. Indeed the term “infrastructure” is so amorphous that it lacks impact if not meaning. One of our first tasks will be to define what is the military and economic infrastructure and what in it is susceptible and vulnerable to RF weapons.
Some 90 to 100 references in 26 pages of the 70-page Quadrennial Defense Review speak to this new threat, but only to a discerning reader; the name for the class is not used. On the other hand, a recent search of the Internet found 2,400 to 2,800 references, while yet another, more thorough search found many tens of thousands of documents where the key words “radio frequency weapons” appear. Some very good people have written books and articles on the subject, the first revealing article known to me appeared in 1987 in the Atlantic Monthly, but for many reasons the knowledge is diffused. In the public sector the subject has yet to draw any real attention or concerted action.
To help set the stage, recognize with experts like a former NSA Director that we are the most vulnerable nation on earth to electronic warfare. This thought is echoed by a former CIA Deputy Director, and a former Deputy Attorney General who forecast that we will have an electronic Pearl Harbor if we do not accept a wake up call. Our vulnerability arises from the fact that we are the most advanced nation electronically and the greatest user of electricity in the world.
On the military side, as in the civilian sector, our current superiority is based on microelectronics. To prevail against us, an adversary must cripple, destroy or deny access to those same microelectronics. Can an adversary do so? Very likely, as this hearing will bring out. All of our military doctrine assumes extensive use of sophisticated electronics and communication systems to ensure information dominance and overwhelming battlefield success. As is the case with our civilian infrastructure and economy, our current dependence is large and will continue to grow. Because our battlefield success and the well being of our civilian economy–with which this committee is especially charged�-are so dependent upon the effectiveness of our microelectronic-based systems, we should fully understand any technology that might be used to defeat our systems. This is particularly true of the newly emerging threat of radio frequency weapons. And even more importantly, we must develop countermeasures before such weapons are used against us.
Before going further, let me explain what these weapons are, where the Russian work has gone since 1949 and the applications of these weapons. If you are interested–as I believe you will be–you may wish to bring before you successive panels of our own leading scientists and experts. I have talked to many of them, heard them make presentations at conferences, and read their articles and books. I will be pleased to provide your staff with names of those who could provide this or other committees with a better understanding. I am also willing to assist in any way that might be helpful.
First of all, an RF weapon is one that uses intense pulses of RF energy to destroy (“burnout”) or degrade (“upset”) the electronics in a target. These weapons can be employed on a narrow beam over a long distance to a point target. They are also able to cover broad targets. They are categorized as high power microwave (HPM) weapons and ultra wide band (UWB) weapons.
The phrase non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse is sometimes used, because these weapons, which are indeed non-nuclear, project the same type of pulse we first learned of in conjunction with nuclear weapons. As a practical matter, a piece of electronic gear on the ground, in a vehicle, ship or plane does not really care whether it is hit by a nuclear magnetic pulse or a non-nuclear one. The effect is the same. It burns out the electronics. The same is true of the computers in this Senate office building, in industry, or on Wall Street.
There is another way these weapons can be delivered to a target, military or civilian. Here the term RF munitions, or RFM is used. Yet these too are properly called RF weapons. These small munitions contain high explosives that produce radio frequency energy as their primary kill mechanism. In the hands of the skilled Russian scientists, these munitions come as hand grenades, mortar rounds, or large artillery shells or missiles. Generally, they produce a short but very intense pulse. While not yet fully understood and with some uncertainties argued as to their capabilities, many scientists are convinced the weapons actually exist. Without making any claims as to what they can do, I offer the following list from open source FSU literature of some nine smaller RF munitions or weapons:
Magnetohydrodynamic Generator Frequency (MHDGF)
Explosive Magnetic Generator of Frequency (EMGF)
Implosive Magnetic Generator of Frequency (IMGF)
Cylindrical Shock Wave Source (CSWS)
Spherical Shock Wave Source (SSWS)
Ferromagnetic Generator of Frequency (FMGF)
Superconductive Former of Magnetic Field Shock Wave (SFMFSW)
Piezoelectric Generator of Frequency (PEGF)
Superconducting Ring Burst Generator (SCRBG)"
MK-ULTRA was mentioned. As a preliminary item to what follows, some facts about the CIA might be worth considering, as delineated in the article "The CIA and the Media: 50 Facts the World Needs to Know" (By James F. Tracy. Global Research, December 15, 2015): http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-cia-and-the-media-50-facts-the-world-needs-to-know/5471956
On MK-Ultra, an archived Wikipedia article has some good information:
"Project MKUltra—sometimes referred to as the CIA's mind control program—was the code name given to an illegal program of experiments on human subjects, designed and undertaken by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Experiments on humans were intended to identify and develop drugs and procedures to be used in interrogations and torture, in order to weaken the individual to force confessions through mind control. Organized through the Scientific Intelligence Division of the CIA, the project coordinated with the Special Operations Division of the U.S. Army's Chemical Corps.[1] The program began in the early 1950s, was officially sanctioned in 1953, was reduced in scope in 1964, further curtailed in 1967 and officially halted in 1973.[2] The program engaged in many illegal activities,[3][4][5] including the use of unwitting U.S. and Canadian citizens as its test subjects, which led to controversy regarding its legitimacy.[3](p74)[6][7][8] MKUltra used numerous methodologies to manipulate people's mental states and alter brain functions, including the surreptitious administration of drugs (especially LSD) and other chemicals, hypnosis,[9] sensory deprivation, isolation, verbal and sexual abuse, as well as various forms of torture.[not verified in body]
The scope of Project MKUltra was broad, with research undertaken at 80 institutions, including 44 colleges and universities, as well as hospitals, prisons, and pharmaceutical companies.[10] The CIA operated through these institutions using front organizations, although sometimes top officials at these institutions were aware of the CIA's involvement.[11] As the US Supreme Court later noted, MKULTRA was:
concerned with "the research and development of chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine operations to control human behavior." The program consisted of some 149 subprojects which the Agency contracted out to various universities, research foundations, and similar institutions. At least 80 institutions and 185 private researchers participated. Because the Agency funded MKUltra indirectly, many of the participating individuals were unaware that they were dealing with the Agency.[12]
Project MKUltra was first brought to public attention in 1975 by the Church Committee of the U.S. Congress, and a Gerald Ford commission to investigate CIA activities within the United States. Investigative efforts were hampered by the fact that CIA Director Richard Helms ordered all MKUltra files destroyed in 1973; the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission investigations relied on the sworn testimony of direct participants and on the relatively small number of documents that survived Helms' destruction order.[13]
[...]
Although the CIA insists that MKUltra-type experiments have been abandoned, some CIA observers say there is little reason to believe it does not continue today under a different set of acronyms.[50] Victor Marchetti, author and 14-year CIA veteran, stated in various interviews that the CIA routinely conducted disinformation campaigns and that CIA mind control research continued. In a 1977 interview, Marchetti specifically called the CIA claim that MKUltra was abandoned a "cover story."[87][88] Author John D. Marks wrote an award winning book published in 1979 titled The Search for the Manchurian Candidate disputing CIA Chief Stansfield Turner assurances that mind control programs have been phased out, indicating that the work went on into the 1970s.[89]": https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_MKUltra&diff=prev&oldid=727520116
One subproject of the MKUltra project was about the electronic control of human behavior (subproject 119, initiated in 1960). In a book by the psychiatrist Colin A. Ross, he stated that Subproject 119 together with Subproject 54 (initiated in 1954 to produce amnesia via a mechanical airwave blast from a distance), were the foundation of non-lethal weapon programs that are currently active. (Ross, Colin A. (2006). The CIA Doctors: Human Rights Violations by American Psychiatrists. Manitou Communications. p. 9)
Also, Aldous Huxley was an insider affiliated with many key internationalist circles, who, according to the former head of INSCOM, was way up in the MKULTRA program: http://www.gnosticmedia.com/GenStubblebine
Huxley discusses emerging trends stemming from the combination of long term oligarchical power with scientific technique, noting how this would lead to the long term degeneration of the bulk of humanity in a speech before UC Berkeley entitled "The Ultimate Revolution" - using the term "scientific dictatorship" to describe the result of combining scientific technique and oligarchical power. Aldous Huxley gave this presentation on behalf of the Ford Foundation's subsidiary, the Center for the Study of Democracy*. After that presentation, he told the technocrats of that institution that the source concerning how scientific technique could be employed to regiment society was "The Technological Society" by Jacques Ellul (this information comes from the introduction to "The Technological Society"). For more on the Ford foundation, see the following: https://archive.org/details/TheTax-exemptFoundations-Excerpts
As for Ford Foundation interlock with the CIA, see "The Ford Foundation and the CIA: A documented case of philanthropic collaboration with the Secret Police" by James Petras, 15 December 2001: https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/FordFandCIA.html
As the researcher Andrew Gavin Marshall noted, "The founding of the CIA was urged by the War and Peace Studies Project of the Council on Foreign Relations in the early 1940s, and the architects of the CIA, designing the shape and organization of the Agency, as well as its functions; were all Wall Street lawyers, largely made up of members of the Council on Foreign Relations. The Deputy Directors of the CIA for the first two decades were all “from the same New York legal and financial circles.”[61]" (Andrew Gavin Marshall. "Origins of the American Empire: Revolution, World Wars and World Order". Global Research, July 28, 2009): http://www.globalresearch.ca/origins-of-the-american-empire-revolution-world-wars-and-world-order/14552
For more on the CFR, see the comments to this: https://archive.org/details/InvisibleEmpire-ANewWorldOrderDefined-FullMovie-ByAlexJone

This is a very sane look at chem trials. A well done inforative look into the strange con trails over the western world.